.
We believe . . . we are convinced . . . we are sure . . . that our
worship is relying (or founded) upon the teaching that The Holy
Spirit (and not any man) is the divine (or the heavenly - not earthly)
administrator - and that this divine one is the (manager or the
superintendent) that is acting on behalf of Jesus Christ in His churches.
What this means is that The NTC is not an organization that has been
built upon the talents – upon the commitment or upon the
strength of mankind . . . but rather the NTC has been built upon the
strength of only ONE man . . . the MAN Jesus Christ.
The question that will naturally arise next is the meaning of Matt
16:18 regarding the words of Jesus about the foundation of The NTC which He says here - that He
built upon “this rock” . . .
Mt 16:18 And I say also unto thee, That thou
art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell
shall not prevail against it.
At this point in our lesson, I will forego any attempt to argue that
“this rock” upon which the church was built - refers to “the rock of
ages” or to Jesus Himself as
opposed to the rock of the disciples or the small stone that the name Peter
represents . . . once again such
an interpretation (that the church was not built upon Peter as the
first pope) but instead that the NTC was built upon Jesus Himself as THE
ROCK of ages upon whom the gates of hell "could not" PREVAIL against or
overcome is (in the absence of proof) . . . a belief that must result TOTALLY from an act of faith.
Consider the fact that a few weeks or months after Matt 16:18 Peter even denied that he knew Jesus . . . I know that Peter was a good man . . . but he was "only" a man . . . and the gates of hell did prevail over his fleshly strength as he denied Jesus.
So this gives a bit of strength to the interpretation that "the rock" referred to "the rock of ages" (Jesus) and NOT to Peter or any other man who possessed a sinful nature such that he was not able to escape the practice of sin in his life . . .
Romans 7: 22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.
24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
If we are looking for some sort of proof to lead us to the understanding that The church was built upon Jesus rather than being built upon Peter . . . consider Eph 3:21
Consider the fact that a few weeks or months after Matt 16:18 Peter even denied that he knew Jesus . . . I know that Peter was a good man . . . but he was "only" a man . . . and the gates of hell did prevail over his fleshly strength as he denied Jesus.
So this gives a bit of strength to the interpretation that "the rock" referred to "the rock of ages" (Jesus) and NOT to Peter or any other man who possessed a sinful nature such that he was not able to escape the practice of sin in his life . . .
Romans 7: 22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.
24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
If we are looking for some sort of proof to lead us to the understanding that The church was built upon Jesus rather than being built upon Peter . . . consider Eph 3:21
Eph 3:21 Unto him be glory in the church by
Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end. Amen.
The only proof that we will be able to uncover . . . that this is the
proper interpretation - is found as we look at the basic purpose of
what the church is . . . and what the church was designed to do. Now our lesson is about “the role” that The Holy Spirit of God is supposed to play
in the church . . .
To be the superintendent (or to be the manager in Christ’s stead) “in
His churches” refers to how The Holy Spirit (in the absence of Jesus) acts on behalf of Jesus IN regard to the church.
As we read Eph 3:21 . . . we understand that “Unto him” refers
directly to Jesus Christ not to the apostle Peter.
Unto Jesus Christ be GLORY . . . the word glory refers to the
following terms: honour – praise – or worship . . . Do you think that it is
ever
appropriate to bring such honour – praise or worship to ANY man . . .
even if that man was an apostle of Jesus?
To bring honour unto Jesus “in the church” which was either
established upon Peter as a man - or upon Jesus as the son of man (God in flesh) . . .
we need look no further than the foundation or the root of the church
that Jesus established . . . if the church rests upon the shoulders of
Peter . . . then how are we able to give honour unto Jesus through the
church?
Not unto Peter (not unto the Pope) . . . but unto Jesus be glory in the church . . . The
word praise refers to paying tribute or the giving of credit . . . once again if Jesus built
the church upon Peter . . . explain how being part of
the church gives credit to Jesus instead of giving glory or credit to the man Peter upon whom it is assumed by many that it was built.
the church gives credit to Jesus instead of giving glory or credit to the man Peter upon whom it is assumed by many that it was built.
To worship Jesus in the church would simply not be possible if the
church in which we offer such worship . . . was built upon a man instead of being built upon the son of man – Jesus Christ.
Not to argue the point at all . . . but to simply express the notion that I accept by faith the interpretation that Matt 16:18 teaches us that Jesus built the New Testament Church NOT upon Peter . . . but
Not to argue the point at all . . . but to simply express the notion that I accept by faith the interpretation that Matt 16:18 teaches us that Jesus built the New Testament Church NOT upon Peter . . . but
upon HIMSELF . . . and that the phrase “the gates of hell shall not
prevail against it” was given to us as all the proof we need that Jesus was talking about Himself instead of
Peter as being the foundation upon which the church has been built.
As one of God’s children . . . have you ever wondered what it would
have been like “to be alive” during the personal ministry of Jesus . . .
What would it have been like to know Jesus personally – the way that
Peter, James, John and the other disciples knew Him?
If I could have known Jesus personally . . . then I would have
listened to . . . and I would have obeyed EVERYTHING that He told me to do.
It is true that today we cannot know Jesus in the flesh . . . but we
can know Him in Spirit.
John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and
the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
If having known Jesus in the flesh – if He had asked you one day to
leave your occupation and “follow” Him in a new way of life as a
“Christian” would you have done it . . . If Jesus had ask you to leave
your present religion and to “follow” Him in a NEW religion called
New Testament Worship in a “church” rather than in the Old Testament
Temple style of worship according to the tradition of the Jews . . . would you have done it?
In your defense . . . you have never met “face to face” with Jesus in
this manner . . . but what I hope you will understand . . . is that you HAVE met “heart to heart” in this manner with the SPIRIT of Jesus
Christ.
The book that we call “The Bible” is commonly called God’s Word.
The basis if my belief “as a Christian” begins with the LITERAL
interpretation that The Bible is genuinely “the breath of God” . . . just
as surely as if God Himself had actually spoken “every word” of The
Bible to me in a “face to face” encounter.
I totally understand that this particular belief of the verbal
inspiration of Gods’ Word cannot in any way be proven to be true . . . it is
not
my intent to argue this point at all . . . it Is however my point - to
simply say that this is where I have placed my faith . . . and this
“perception” of what (I believe) The Bible really is - has drastically
altered (or changed) not only the direction of my life . . . but this one
act of faith has also brought about a change in the direction of my
worship.
The point being . . . that if I choose to disregard what The Bible
“teaches” that I should do with my life . . . then in reality I have actually
chosen to disregard what God Himself has “taught” me to do . . . I say
this because of “the faith” that allows me to accept The Bible as literally
being God’s Word.
This concept of “believing” that The Bible is actually God’s Word is essential to a proper understanding of how The
Holy Spirit is supposed to function in our individual lives . . . and also in
the churches where we worship.
So before we continue with the next lesson . . . I want you to evaluate your "perception" of what we call God's Word (The Bible).
To enter into any meaningful discussion of God or "religion" . . . the individuals in that discussion must BEGIN their discussion by lining up at THE SAME starting point . . . like the beginning of a race.
If we do not believe what I have described God's Word to be . . . then the remainder of our discussion about the Holy Spirit and The NTC . . . is pointless . . .
If I line up at one starting point . . . and if you begin at a different location (or starting place) in our discussion . . . then we are not running in the same race . . . which means that we cannot be discussing the same thing.
Answer the question about your perception of The Bible - if you accept (through faith) that it is genuinely and literally God's Word . . . THEN and ONLY THEN can we can proceed from the SAME reference point to learn what The Bible (what God) is attempting to teach us.
To learn what God is attempting to teach us with The Bible . . . is the purpose that the The Holy Spirit serves in our lives . . . we will learn more about this in the next lesson . . .
So before we continue with the next lesson . . . I want you to evaluate your "perception" of what we call God's Word (The Bible).
To enter into any meaningful discussion of God or "religion" . . . the individuals in that discussion must BEGIN their discussion by lining up at THE SAME starting point . . . like the beginning of a race.
If we do not believe what I have described God's Word to be . . . then the remainder of our discussion about the Holy Spirit and The NTC . . . is pointless . . .
If I line up at one starting point . . . and if you begin at a different location (or starting place) in our discussion . . . then we are not running in the same race . . . which means that we cannot be discussing the same thing.
Answer the question about your perception of The Bible - if you accept (through faith) that it is genuinely and literally God's Word . . . THEN and ONLY THEN can we can proceed from the SAME reference point to learn what The Bible (what God) is attempting to teach us.
To learn what God is attempting to teach us with The Bible . . . is the purpose that the The Holy Spirit serves in our lives . . . we will learn more about this in the next lesson . . .